| Liverpool | East Anglia |
1 - A Safe Place
2 - Environmental Concerns
3 - Scientists and Citizens
4 - Local Issues
5 - Science Issues
6 - What About the Future?
The community x-change is deliberately seeking to reach people who don't normally have the opportunity to be involved in discussions about issues like climate change.
Two outreach workers therefore spent a number of months building contacts with various community groups in East Anglia. In the end the final panel was made up of 39 people, primarily from Norwich, Lowestoft and Peterborough. Participants included young men from a Norwich hostel and people from black and minority ethnic groups, some of whom did not speak English. Sixteen participants had responded to an invitation sent to people on the electoral roll and eight scientists were recruited through the University of East Anglia and Norwich Research Park.
Six young people were involved in the workshops as they had previously been part of a community video project. They worked with the other participants to produce a video of the x-changes. The main reporting mechanism for the community x-change is a series of short videos.
This diverse group met over four days on 10, 11 June and 1 & 29 July. We were delighted that only one or two people did not attend all four days.
The climate change community x-change workshops were run over four days, starting with the weekend of 10 & 11 June. The workshops were held in Norwich in the pavilion at Waterloo Park. Although participants were coming from as far as Lowestoft and Peterborough, it was felt that this location would be easy to get to in terms of transport links.
As well as the location, other aspects of accessibility were considered. Participants' travel costs were covered, including taxis for the infirm, as were child care, a contribution to loss of earnings and translation.
Despite the large size of the group, and with many people not knowing anyone else attending, relationships quickly developed, especially as people began to meet those who lived close to them.
Initial discussions focussed on people's local environment. In particular, this included issues the group deemed to be important to them, such as transport and crime. This enabled the group to feel they had ownership of the discussions and that no question or comment was out of bounds. The group also began to gel together.
On Sunday 11 June, a local environmental campaigner, Maxine Narburgh from Suffolk Connect, helped to facilitate the sessions. Since one of the aims of the meetings was to empower those attending and to enable them to feel that they could contribute to action on the issues being discussed, Maxine had also invited six environmental volunteers to attend - people with whom she works. These volunteers enabled the group to begin to think about issues around the environment and climate change. In particular, this helped the participants to relate the issues they had raised to climate change.
On the third day, Saturday 1 July, the participants delved deeper into the issues that they had begun to discuss over the first weekend. Part of the process involved the group looking at various scenarios, which were written to present some of the tensions there are in responding to a subject like climate change.
Participants talked about the issues in small groups, two of which decided to present their thoughts in the form of a drama. One drama addressed flooding in Norfolk and the other issues of exclusion and isolation. In both cases, the dramas brought a real depth and richness to the process.
The last day of the workshops was Saturday 29 July. Participants were given the opportunity to discuss issues that had been raised during the process and that they are passionate about, with "information providers".
One session in the previous workshop on 1 July had been devoted to drawing up a list of potential information providers for this final day. The group were therefore able to say who they deemed to be trusted sources of information.
For the first half of the final workshop participants each chose a couple of issues which they wanted to talk about with the information providers. Having divided themselves into small groups, with issues in common, a list of potential questions was generated to ask each of the knowledge providers. Over lunch the participants were able to meet the information providers before having the opportunity to question them.
The information providers were:
The format of this final session was held in a similar manner to a world café. First, the participants returned to their small groups. The information providers then each joined a group. After about 15 minutes, the information providers moved on to the adjacent group, so that by the end of the session, each group had questioned each information provider.